Rule 23 of 32 · Chapter V — Carry, Don't Control
Give credit in public using names, and give correction in private using one.
Why this rule exists
Credit is worth more when it is specific and witnessed; vague praise for "the team" gives nobody anything to carry forward. Correction delivered in front of others stops being about the work and becomes about status, and the person will spend their energy defending themselves rather than fixing anything. The asymmetry is the whole point: amplify the good, contain the hard.
In practice
When you report on a win, say who did what — the actual name, the actual contribution. When something needs to change, take it to a one-on-one, be direct about the specific behaviour, and be clear that you expect it to be fixable. Never let a correction reach someone secondhand.
When it doesn't apply
When conduct affects the whole group — a rule everyone broke, or behaviour others witnessed and are waiting to see addressed — silence in public reads as approval, and you name the standard openly while still keeping the individual conversation private.